On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:37 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The bpf_caps array is shorter without CAP_BPF, avoid out of bounds reads > if this isn't defined. Working around this avoids -Wno-array-bounds with > clang. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> > tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c > index a43a6f10b564..359960a8f1de 100644 > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c > @@ -843,9 +843,14 @@ static int handle_perms(void) > else > p_err("missing %s%s%s%s%s%s%s%srequired for full feature probing; run as root or use 'unprivileged'", > capability_msg(bpf_caps, 0), > +#ifdef CAP_BPF > capability_msg(bpf_caps, 1), > capability_msg(bpf_caps, 2), > - capability_msg(bpf_caps, 3)); > + capability_msg(bpf_caps, 3) > +#else > + "", "", "", "", "", "" > +#endif /* CAP_BPF */ > + ); > goto exit_free; > } > > -- > 2.29.0.rc2.309.g374f81d7ae-goog >