On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:31 PM YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:57 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think it's fine to just have this "dangle" with a help text update of > > "if seccomp action caching is supported by the architecture, provide the > > /proc/$pid ..." > > I think it would be weird if someone sees this help text and wonder... > "hmm does my architecture support seccomp action caching" and without > a clear pointer to how seccomp action cache works, goes and compiles > the kernel with this config option on for the purpose of knowing if > their arch supports it... Or, is it a common practice in the kernel to > leave dangling configs? Bump, in case this question was missed. I don't really want to miss the 5.10 merge window... YiFei Zhu
