Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: Add profiler test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 12:56 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 06:12:39PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > +
> > +#ifdef UNROLL
> > +#pragma unroll
> > +#endif
> > +     for (int i = 0; i < MAX_CGROUPS_PATH_DEPTH; i++) {
> > +             filepart_length =
> > +                     bpf_probe_read_str(payload, MAX_PATH, BPF_CORE_READ(cgroup_node, name));
> > +             if (!cgroup_node)
> > +                     return payload;
> > +             if (cgroup_node == cgroup_root_node)
> > +                     *root_pos = payload - payload_start;
> > +             if (filepart_length <= MAX_PATH) {
> > +                     barrier_var(filepart_length);
> > +                     payload += filepart_length;
> > +             }
> > +             cgroup_node = BPF_CORE_READ(cgroup_node, parent);
> > +     }
> > +     return payload;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ino_t get_inode_from_kernfs(struct kernfs_node* node)
> > +{
> > +     struct kernfs_node___52* node52 = (void*)node;
> > +
> > +     if (bpf_core_field_exists(node52->id.ino)) {
> > +             barrier_var(node52);
> > +             return BPF_CORE_READ(node52, id.ino);
> > +     } else {
> > +             barrier_var(node);
> > +             return (u64)BPF_CORE_READ(node, id);
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> > +int pids_cgrp_id = 1;
>
>
> hi,
> I'm getting compilation failure with this:
>
>           CLNG-LLC [test_maps] profiler2.o
>         In file included from progs/profiler2.c:6:
>         progs/profiler.inc.h:246:5: error: redefinition of 'pids_cgrp_id' as different kind of symbol
>         int pids_cgrp_id = 1;
>             ^
>         /home/jolsa/linux-qemu/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/vmlinux.h:14531:2: note: previous definition is here
>                 pids_cgrp_id = 11,

Interesting.
You probably have CONFIG_CGROUP_PIDS in your .config?
I don't and bpf CI doesn't have it either, so this issue wasn't spotted earlier.

I can hard code 11, of course, but
but maybe Andrii has a cool way to use co-re to deal with this?
I think
"extern bool CONFIG_CGROUP_PIDS __kconfig"
won't work.
A good opportunity to try to use bpf_core_enum_value_exists() ?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux