On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:25 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is the idea that any syscall that's out of range for this (e.g. all of > the x32 syscalls) is unoptimized? I'm okay with this, but I think it > could use a comment. Yes, any syscall number that is out of range is unoptimized. Where do you think I should put a comment? seccomp_cache_check_allow_bitmap above `if (unlikely(syscall_nr < 0 || syscall_nr >= bitmap_size))`, with something like "any syscall number out of range is unoptimized"? YiFei Zhu
