Re: [PATCH] use valid btf in bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, 0, ...);

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/5/20 6:41 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
bpf_program__set_attach_target() will always fail with fd=0 (attach to a
kernel symbol) because obj->btf_vmlinux is NULL and there is no way to
set it.

Fix this by explicitly calling libbpf_find_kernel_btf() in the function.

Signed-off-by: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 9 ++++++---
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index a4f55f8a460d..3a63db86666f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -10352,10 +10352,13 @@ int bpf_program__set_attach_target(struct bpf_program *prog,
  	if (attach_prog_fd)
  		btf_id = libbpf_find_prog_btf_id(attach_func_name,
  						 attach_prog_fd);
-	else
-		btf_id = __find_vmlinux_btf_id(prog->obj->btf_vmlinux,
-					       attach_func_name,
+	else {
+		struct btf *btf = libbpf_find_kernel_btf();
+
+		btf_id = __find_vmlinux_btf_id(btf, attach_func_name,
  					       prog->expected_attach_type);
+		btf__free(btf);
+	}

Doesn't feel this is right fix. In libbpf, we have API function
   libbpf_find_vmlinux_btf_id
just doing the above.

Also, could you point out why btf_vmlinux is NULL? Is this related
to fd = 0? We probably
should fix the problem there since what if other API functions
like bpf_program__set_attach_target() wants btf_vmlinux. We should
not duplicate this logic to other API functions.

if (btf_id < 0)
  		return btf_id;




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux