Re: [PATCH v3 seccomp 1/5] x86: Enable seccomp architecture tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:33:15PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:21 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:19:12AM -0500, YiFei Zhu wrote:
> > > From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Provide seccomp internals with the details to calculate which syscall
> > > table the running kernel is expecting to deal with. This allows for
> > > efficient architecture pinning and paves the way for constant-action
> > > bitmaps.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > [YiFei: Removed x32, added macro for nr_syscalls]
> > > Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [...]
> > But otherwise, yes, looks good to me. For this patch, I think the S-o-b chain is probably more
> > accurately captured as:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Co-developed-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> (Technically, https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by
> says that "every Co-developed-by: must be immediately followed by a
> Signed-off-by: of the associated co-author" (and has an example of how
> that should look).)

Right, but it is not needed for the commit author (here, the From:),
the second example given in the docs shows this:

	From: From Author <from@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

	<changelog>

	Co-developed-by: Random Co-Author <random@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Signed-off-by: Random Co-Author <random@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Signed-off-by: From Author <from@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Co-developed-by: Submitting Co-Author <sub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Signed-off-by: Submitting Co-Author <sub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

and there is no third co-developer, so it's:

	From: From Author <from@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

	<changelog>

	Signed-off-by: From Author <from@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Co-developed-by: Submitting Co-Author <sub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Signed-off-by: Submitting Co-Author <sub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If I'm the From, and YiFei Zhu is the submitting co-developer, then
it's:

	From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

	<changelog>

	Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Co-developed-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

which is what I suggested.

-- 
Kees Cook



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux