Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: add tests for BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Sep 30, 2020, at 12:26 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:20:58AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pe_preserve_elems.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pe_preserve_elems.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..dc77e406de41f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pe_preserve_elems.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +// Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook
>> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> 
> Does it actually need vmlinux.h ?
> Just checking to make sure it compiles on older kernels.

We can include linux/bpf.h instead. 

[...]

>> +	long ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = bpf_perf_event_read_value(&array_2, 0, &val, sizeof(val));
>> +	bpf_printk("read_array_2 returns %ld", ret);
> 
> Please remove printk from the tests. It only spams the trace_pipe.
> 
>> +	return ret;
> 
> The return code is already checked as far as I can see.
> That's enough to pass/fail the test, right?

Yes, we can remove the bpf_printk() here. Fixing this in v4.

Thanks,
Song





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux