Re: [PATCH v2 seccomp 5/6] selftests/seccomp: Compare bitmap vs filter overhead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:47 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> BTW, did this benchmark tool's results match your expectations from what
> you saw with your RFC? (I assume it helped since you've included in
> here.)

Yes, I updated the commit message with the benchmarks of this patch
series. Though, given that I'm running in a qemu-kvm on my laptop that
has a lot of stuffs running on it (and with the cursed ThinkPad T480
CPU throttling), I had to throw much more syscalls at it to pass the
"approximately equals" expectation... though no idea about what's
going on with 732 vs 737.

Or if you mean if I expected these results, yes.

YiFei Zhu



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux