On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:10:42PM +0200, Nicolas Rybowski wrote:
> +
> +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_mptcp_sock, struct sock *, sk)
> +{
> + if (sk_fullsock(sk) && sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP && sk_is_mptcp(sk)) {
> + struct mptcp_subflow_context *mptcp_sfc = mptcp_subflow_ctx(sk);
Could you add !sk check here as well?
See commit 8c33dadc3e0e ("bpf: Bpf_skc_to_* casting helpers require a NULL check on sk")
It's not strictly necessary yet, but see below.
Also this new helper is not exercised from C test. Only from asm.
Could you update patch 4 with such additional logic?
> +
> + return (unsigned long)mptcp_sfc->conn;
I think we shouldn't extend the verifier with PTR_TO_MPTCP_SOCK and similar concept anymore.
This approach doesn't scale and we have better way to handle such field access with BTF.
> + }
> + return (unsigned long)NULL;
> +}
> +
> +const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_mptcp_sock_proto = {
> + .func = bpf_mptcp_sock,
> + .gpl_only = false,
> + .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MPTCP_SOCK_OR_NULL,
In this particular case you can do:
+ .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL,
Then bpf_mptcp_sock_convert_ctx_access() will no longer be necessary
and bpf prog will be able to access all mptcp_sock fields right away.
Will that work for your use case?
