Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: Fix branch offset in JIT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:01:15 +0100 Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ilias,
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 04:23:50PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:35:04PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:  
> > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 01:20:43PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:  
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:36:21AM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:  
> > > > > > Running the eBPF test_verifier leads to random errors looking like this:  
> > 
> > [...]
> > > >   
> > > Any suggestion on any Fixes I should apply? The original code was 'correct' and
> > > broke only when bounded loops and their self-tests were introduced.  
> > 
> > Ouch, that's pretty bad as it means nobody is regression testing BPF on
> > arm64 with mainline. Damn.
> 
> Yes, it unfortunately seems that upstream is lacking BPF regression
> testing for ARM64 :-(
> 
> This bug surfaced when Red Hat QA tested our kernel backports, on
> different archs.

Naresh from Linaro reported it during his tests on 5.8-rc1 as well [1].
I've included both Jiri and him on the v2 as reporters.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/11/58
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>   Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>   MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
>   LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux