On 9/9/20 9:32 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:40 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote:
Andrii reported that with latest clang, when building selftests, we have
error likes:
error: progs/test_sysctl_loop1.c:23:16: in function sysctl_tcp_mem i32 (%struct.bpf_sysctl*):
Looks like the BPF stack limit of 512 bytes is exceeded.
Please move large on stack variables into BPF per-cpu array map.
The error is triggered by the following LLVM patch:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D87134&d=DwIBaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=bsWiCrZT5nrmfm3_om52dUcH95ej2IV4N_-xOE1v14U&s=yM0hEwDFkjIegJg44-iJ8dZYLUk1F7YlKOm65VObloQ&e=
For example, the following code is from test_sysctl_loop1.c:
static __always_inline int is_tcp_mem(struct bpf_sysctl *ctx)
{
volatile char tcp_mem_name[] = "net/ipv4/tcp_mem/very_very_very_very_long_pointless_string";
...
}
Without the above LLVM patch, the compiler did optimization to load the string
(59 bytes long) with 7 64bit loads, 1 8bit load and 1 16bit load,
occupying 64 byte stack size.
With the above LLVM patch, the compiler only uses 8bit loads, but subregister is 32bit.
So stack requirements become 4 * 59 = 236 bytes. Together with other stuff on
the stack, total stack size exceeds 512 bytes, hence compiler complains and quits.
To fix the issue, removing "volatile" key word or changing "volatile" to
"const"/"static const" does not work, the string is put in .rodata.str1.1 section,
which libbpf did not process it and errors out with
libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(6) .rodata.str1.1
libbpf: prog 'sysctl_tcp_mem': bad map relo against '.L__const.is_tcp_mem.tcp_mem_name'
in section '.rodata.str1.1'
Defining the string const as global variable can fix the issue as it puts the string constant
in '.rodata' section which is recognized by libbpf. In the future, when libbpf can process
'.rodata.str*.*' properly, the global definition can be changed back to local definition.
Defining tcp_mem_name as a global, however, triggered a verifier failure.
./test_progs -n 7/21
libbpf: load bpf program failed: Permission denied
libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG ---
libbpf:
invalid stack off=0 size=1
verification time 6975 usec
stack depth 160+64
processed 889 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 4 total_states
14 peak_states 14 mark_read 10
libbpf: -- END LOG --
libbpf: failed to load program 'sysctl_tcp_mem'
libbpf: failed to load object 'test_sysctl_loop2.o'
test_bpf_verif_scale:FAIL:114
#7/21 test_sysctl_loop2.o:FAIL
This actually exposed a bpf program bug. In test_sysctl_loop{1,2}, we have code
like
const char tcp_mem_name[] = "<...long string...>";
...
char name[64];
...
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(tcp_mem_name); ++i)
if (name[i] != tcp_mem_name[i])
return 0;
In the above code, if sizeof(tcp_mem_name) > 64, name[i] access may be
out of bound. The sizeof(tcp_mem_name) is 59 for test_sysctl_loop1.c and
79 for test_sysctl_loop2.c.
Without promotion-to-global change, old compiler generates code where
the overflowed stack access is actually filled with valid value, so hiding
the bpf program bug. With promotion-to-global change, the code is different,
more specifically, the previous loading constants to stack is gone, and
"name" occupies stack[-64:0] and overflow access triggers a verifier error.
To fix the issue, adjust "name" buffer size properly.
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop1.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop2.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Changelog:
v1 -> v2:
. The tcp_mem_name change actually triggers a verifier failure due to
a bpf program bug. Fixing the bpf program bug can make test pass
with both old and latest llvm. (Alexei)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop1.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop1.c
index 458b0d69133e..4b600b1f522f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop1.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop1.c
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@
#define MAX_ULONG_STR_LEN 7
#define MAX_VALUE_STR_LEN (TCP_MEM_LOOPS * MAX_ULONG_STR_LEN)
+const char tcp_mem_name[] = "net/ipv4/tcp_mem/very_very_very_very_long_pointless_string";
static __always_inline int is_tcp_mem(struct bpf_sysctl *ctx)
{
- volatile char tcp_mem_name[] = "net/ipv4/tcp_mem/very_very_very_very_long_pointless_string";
unsigned char i;
char name[64];
int ret;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop2.c
index b2e6f9b0894d..d01056142520 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop2.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sysctl_loop2.c
@@ -18,11 +18,12 @@
#define MAX_ULONG_STR_LEN 7
#define MAX_VALUE_STR_LEN (TCP_MEM_LOOPS * MAX_ULONG_STR_LEN)
+const char tcp_mem_name[] = "net/ipv4/tcp_mem/very_very_very_very_long_pointless_string_to_stress_byte_loop";
static __attribute__((noinline)) int is_tcp_mem(struct bpf_sysctl *ctx)
{
- volatile char tcp_mem_name[] = "net/ipv4/tcp_mem/very_very_very_very_long_pointless_string_to_stress_byte_loop";
unsigned char i;
- char name[64];
+ /* the above tcp_mem_name length is 79, make name buffer length 80 */
+ char name[80];
Wow, did you really count? Why not use sizeof(tcp_mem_name) and drop
The assembly code told me it is 79 and I double checked.
the comment entirely?
Original intention is probably multiple of 8. At least memset will
have fewer instructions since all 64bit store. But I do see
sizeof(tcp_mem_name) is simpler and easier to understand. Will
respin and send v3.
int ret;
memset(name, 0, sizeof(name));
--
2.24.1
