Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/9] net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[...]

> >  				rx_desc->buf_phys_addr,
> >  				len, dma_dir);
> > -	if (data_len > 0 && sinfo->nr_frags < MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> > -		skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[sinfo->nr_frags];
> > +	if (data_len > 0 && *nfrags < MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> > +		skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[*nfrags];
> >  		skb_frag_off_set(frag, pp->rx_offset_correction);
> >  		skb_frag_size_set(frag, data_len);
> >  		__skb_frag_set_page(frag, page);
> > -		sinfo->nr_frags++;
> > +		*nfrags = *nfrags + 1;
> 
> nit, why do you use nfrags variable instead of sinfo->nr_frags (as it was
> before this patch) ?
>                You doesn't seem to use the nfrags variable in the
> caller function and you update nr_frags as well.
>                If it's used in a different patch (haven't
> reviewed it all yet), maybe move it to that patch                ? (sorry in
> advance if I missed the logic here)

nfrags pointer is used to avoid the sinfo->nr_frags initialization in
mvneta_swbm_rx_frame() since skb_shared_info is not in the cache usually.
AFAIK the hw does not provide the info "this is the second descriptor" but
just "this the frist/last descriptor".

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> > +
> > +		if (rx_desc->status & MVNETA_RXD_LAST_DESC) {
> > +			sinfo->nr_frags = *nfrags;
> > +			xdp->mb = true;
> > +		}
> >  		rx_desc->buf_phys_addr = 0;
> >               ...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux