Em Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:50:13PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:48:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 09:22:10AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:03 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:41:14PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:24 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:10 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 05:59:46PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:57:31AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > > > > [jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf test 17 -v
> > > > > > > 17: Setup struct perf_event_attr :
> >
> > > > > > > running './tests/attr/test-record-C0'
> > > > > > > expected sample_period=4000, got 3000
> > > > > > > FAILED './tests/attr/test-record-C0' - match failure
> >
> > > > > > I'm not able to reproduce this. Do you have a build configuration or
> > > > > > something else to look at? The test doesn't seem obviously connected
> > > > > > with this patch.
> >
> > > > > Jiri, any update? Thanks,
> >
> > > > sorry, I rebased and ran it again and it passes for me now,
> > > > so it got fixed along the way
> >
> > > No worries, thanks for the update! It'd be nice to land this and the
> > > other libpfm fixes.
> >
> > I applied it and it generated this regression:
> >
> > FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-pfm-period' - match failure
> >
> > I'll look at the other patches that are pending in this regard to see
> > what needs to be squashed so that we don't break bisect.
>
> So, more context:
>
> running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-pfm-period'
> expected exclude_hv=0, got 1
> FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-pfm-period' - match failure
> test child finished with -1
> ---- end ----
> Setup struct perf_event_attr: FAILED!
> [root@five ~]#
>
> Ian, can you take a look at this?
Further tests I've performed:
Committer testing:
Not linking with libpfm:
# ldd ~/bin/perf | grep libpfm
#
Before:
# perf record -c 10000 -e cycles/period=12345/,instructions sleep 0.0001
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.052 MB perf.data (258 samples) ]
# perf evlist -v
cycles/period=12345/: size: 120, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 12345, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ID, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, enable_on_exec: 1, task: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1
instructions: size: 120, config: 0x1, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 10000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ID, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, enable_on_exec: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1
#
After:
#
# perf record -c 10000 -e cycles/period=12345/,instructions sleep 0.0001
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.053 MB perf.data (284 samples) ]
# perf evlist -v
cycles/period=12345/: size: 120, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 12345, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ID, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, enable_on_exec: 1, task: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1
instructions: size: 120, config: 0x1, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 10000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ID, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, enable_on_exec: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1
#
Linking with libpfm:
# ldd ~/bin/perf | grep libpfm
libpfm.so.4 => /lib64/libpfm.so.4 (0x00007f54c7d75000)
#
# perf record -c 10000 --pfm-events=cycles:period=77777 sleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.043 MB perf.data (141 samples) ]
# perf evlist -v
cycles:period=77777: size: 120, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 10000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, exclude_hv: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, enable_on_exec: 1, task: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1
#
After:
# perf record -c 10000 --pfm-events=cycles:period=77777 sleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.039 MB perf.data (19 samples) ]
# perf evlist -v
cycles:period=77777: size: 120, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 77777, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, exclude_hv: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, enable_on_exec: 1, task: 1, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1
#
