Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Introduce sleepable BPF programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:52 AM Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 00:02, Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > index 6f5a9f51cc03..3ebfdb7bd427 100644
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > +/* non exhaustive list of sleepable bpf_lsm_*() functions */
> > +BTF_SET_START(btf_sleepable_lsm_hooks)
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_LSM
> > +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_file_mprotect)
> > +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_bprm_committed_creds)
> > +#endif
> > +BTF_SET_END(btf_sleepable_lsm_hooks)
> > +
>
> I'm getting:
>   FAILED unresolved symbol btf_sleepable_lsm_hooks
> when CONFIG_BPF_LSM is not set.
>
> Adding a BTF_UNUSED_ID unconditionally to the set helps, but I'm on a
> BTF limb here, so there might be a more correct/obvious workaround
> here...

yeah. thanks for reporting. The fix is on the way.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux