Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 28/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:23:21AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:01:32AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> >  
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
> > index 473665cac67e..49d1dcaf7999 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
> > @@ -26,17 +26,12 @@ __u32 g_line = 0;
> >  		return 0;	\
> >  })
> >  
> > -struct bpf_map_memory {
> > -	__u32 pages;
> > -} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> > -
> >  struct bpf_map {
> >  	enum bpf_map_type map_type;
> >  	__u32 key_size;
> >  	__u32 value_size;
> >  	__u32 max_entries;
> >  	__u32 id;
> > -	struct bpf_map_memory memory;
> >  } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> 
> hmm. Did you build selftests?
> 
> progs/map_ptr_kern.c:45:14: error: no member named 'memory' in 'struct bpf_map'
>         VERIFY(map->memory.pages > 0);
>                ~~~  ^
> progs/map_ptr_kern.c:25:8: note: expanded from macro 'VERIFY'

Oops, thanks, will fix in v5.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux