On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 4:13 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add a selftest excercising bpf-to-bpf subprogram calls, as well as multiple
> entry-point BPF programs per section. Also make sure that BPF CO-RE works for
> such set ups both for sub-programs and for multi-entry sections.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/subprogs.c | 31 +++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_subprogs.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/subprogs.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_subprogs.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/subprogs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/subprogs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a00abf58c037
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/subprogs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <time.h>
> +#include "test_subprogs.skel.h"
> +
> +static int duration;
> +
> +void test_subprogs(void)
> +{
> + struct test_subprogs *skel;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = test_subprogs__open_and_load();
> + if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open skeleton\n"))
> + return;
> +
> + err = test_subprogs__attach(skel);
> + if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "failed to attach skeleton: %d\n", err))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + usleep(1);
> +
> + CHECK(skel->bss->res1 != 12, "res1", "got %d, exp %d\n", skel->bss->res1, 12);
> + CHECK(skel->bss->res2 != 17, "res2", "got %d, exp %d\n", skel->bss->res2, 17);
> + CHECK(skel->bss->res3 != 19, "res3", "got %d, exp %d\n", skel->bss->res3, 19);
> + CHECK(skel->bss->res4 != 36, "res4", "got %d, exp %d\n", skel->bss->res4, 36);
> +
res4 was a late addition, and apparently I missed test_progs build
failure among other local warnings. I'll add res4 in BPF code in the
next version.
> +cleanup:
> + test_subprogs__destroy(skel);
> +}
[...]
