Em Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:36:52 -0700 John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:46 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab > <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, IMO, the best is to keep it on staging for a while, until those > > remaining bugs gets solved. > > > > I added this series, together with the regulator driver and > > a few other patches (including a hack to fix a Kernel 5.8 > > regression at WiFi ) at: > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mchehab_kernel/hikey-970/-/commits/master > > Sorry, one more small request: Could you create a branch that only has > the DRM driver changes in it? > > The reason I ask, is that since the HiKey960 isn't affected by the > majority of the problems you listed as motivation for going through > staging. So if we can validate that your tree works fine on HiKey960, > the series can be cleaned up and submitted properly upstream to enable > that SoC, and the outstanding 970 issues can be worked out afterwards > against mainline. Well, if support for HiKey 960 is OK, I guess what we can do is to not push the patch with DT bindings for hikey970. We should probably fix the color swap thing at the driver first. >From my side, provided that the history is preserved, I don't mind if this is merged: - via staging tree; - at dri-devel tree; - or having a the historic patchsets merged at /staging, with a follow up patch moving it from staging/ into /gpu/drm/. Thanks, Mauro
