Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: add CO-RE relo test for TYPE_ID_LOCAL/TYPE_ID_TARGET

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/18/20 10:28 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
Add tests for BTF type ID relocations. To allow testing this, enhance
core_relo.c test runner to allow dynamic initialization of test inputs.
If __builtin_btf_type_id() is not supported by Clang, skip tests.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
---
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c     | 168 +++++++++++++++++-
  .../bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_type_id.c       |   3 +
  ...tf__core_reloc_type_id___missing_targets.c |   3 +
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h    |  40 +++++
  .../bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_type_based.c    |  14 --
  .../bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_type_id.c       | 107 +++++++++++
  6 files changed, 316 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_type_id.c
  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_type_id___missing_targets.c
  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_type_id.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
index b775ce0ede41..ad550510ef69 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
  #include "progs/core_reloc_types.h"
  #include <sys/mman.h>
  #include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+
+static int duration = 0;
#define STRUCT_TO_CHAR_PTR(struct_name) (const char *)&(struct struct_name)
[...]
+
+typedef struct a_struct named_struct_typedef;
+
+typedef int (*func_proto_typedef)(long);
+
+typedef char arr_typedef[20];
+
+struct core_reloc_type_id_output {
+	int local_anon_struct;
+	int local_anon_union;
+	int local_anon_enum;
+	int local_anon_func_proto_ptr;
+	int local_anon_void_ptr;
+	int local_anon_arr;
+
+	int local_struct;
+	int local_union;
+	int local_enum;
+	int local_int;
+	int local_struct_typedef;
+	int local_func_proto_typedef;
+	int local_arr_typedef;
+
+	int targ_struct;
+	int targ_union;
+	int targ_enum;
+	int targ_int;
+	int targ_struct_typedef;
+	int targ_func_proto_typedef;
+	int targ_arr_typedef;
+};
+
+/* preserve types even if Clang doesn't support built-in */
+struct a_struct t1 = {};
+union a_union t2 = {};
+enum an_enum t3 = 0;
+named_struct_typedef t4 = {};
+func_proto_typedef t5 = 0;
+arr_typedef t6 = {};
+
+SEC("raw_tracepoint/sys_enter")
+int test_core_type_id(void *ctx)
+{
+#if __has_builtin(__builtin_btf_type_id)

__builtin_btf_type_id is introduced in llvm11 but has issues for the following case:
   - struct t { ... } is defined
   - typedef struct t __t is defined
both "struct t" and "__t" are used in __builtin_btf_type_id in the same function. This is a corner case but it will make the test failure with llvm11.

I suggest to test builtin __builtin_preserve_type_info here with a comment to explain why. This will available test failure with llvm11.


+	struct core_reloc_type_id_output *out = (void *)&data.out;
+
+	out->local_anon_struct = bpf_core_type_id_local(struct { int marker_field; });
+	out->local_anon_union = bpf_core_type_id_local(union { int marker_field; });
+	out->local_anon_enum = bpf_core_type_id_local(enum { MARKER_ENUM_VAL = 123 });
+	out->local_anon_func_proto_ptr = bpf_core_type_id_local(_Bool(*)(int));
+	out->local_anon_void_ptr = bpf_core_type_id_local(void *);
+	out->local_anon_arr = bpf_core_type_id_local(_Bool[47]);
+
+	out->local_struct = bpf_core_type_id_local(struct a_struct);
+	out->local_union = bpf_core_type_id_local(union a_union);
+	out->local_enum = bpf_core_type_id_local(enum an_enum);
+	out->local_int = bpf_core_type_id_local(int);
+	out->local_struct_typedef = bpf_core_type_id_local(named_struct_typedef);
+	out->local_func_proto_typedef = bpf_core_type_id_local(func_proto_typedef);
+	out->local_arr_typedef = bpf_core_type_id_local(arr_typedef);
+
+	out->targ_struct = bpf_core_type_id_kernel(struct a_struct);
+	out->targ_union = bpf_core_type_id_kernel(union a_union);
+	out->targ_enum = bpf_core_type_id_kernel(enum an_enum);
+	out->targ_int = bpf_core_type_id_kernel(int);
+	out->targ_struct_typedef = bpf_core_type_id_kernel(named_struct_typedef);
+	out->targ_func_proto_typedef = bpf_core_type_id_kernel(func_proto_typedef);
+	out->targ_arr_typedef = bpf_core_type_id_kernel(arr_typedef);
+#else
+	data.skip = true;
+#endif
+
+	return 0;
+}
+

empty line at the end of file?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux