Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 5/7] bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 8/18/20 5:23 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 05:10:34PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/18/20 3:27 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 06:46:53PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:

[...]

a get_file
>> rather fcheck followed by get_file_rcu:
>>
>> #define get_file_rcu_many(x, cnt)	\
>> 	atomic_long_add_unless(&(x)->f_count, (cnt), 0)
>> #define get_file_rcu(x) get_file_rcu_many((x), 1)
>> #define file_count(x)	atomic_long_read(&(x)->f_count)
>>
>> But there is an easier way than all of this and this is to use 
>> fget_raw which also calls get_file_rcu_many 
>> and ensures a non-zero count before getting a reference.
> ic. Make sense.
> 
> There are fdget() and fdput() also which are used in bpf/syscall.c.

Yeah we could use fdget_raw but we don't really need the struct fd but just the 
struct file.

he non-raw versions masks away FMODE_PATH (O_PATH) files, we should still be able to
access blobs on the O_PATH files, thus the _raw version here.

- KP

> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux