On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:21 AM Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > test_progs reports the segmentation fault as below > > $ sudo ./test_progs -t mmap --verbose > test_mmap:PASS:skel_open_and_load 0 nsec > ...... > test_mmap:PASS:adv_mmap1 0 nsec > test_mmap:PASS:adv_mmap2 0 nsec > test_mmap:PASS:adv_mmap3 0 nsec > test_mmap:PASS:adv_mmap4 0 nsec > Segmentation fault > > This issue was triggered because mmap() and munmap() used inconsistent > length parameters; mmap() creates a new mapping of 3*page_size, but the > length parameter set in the subsequent re-map and munmap() functions is > 4*page_size; this leads to the destruction of the process space. > > Another issue is that when unmap the second page fails, the length > parameter to delete tmp1 mappings should be 3*page_size. > > Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@xxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mmap.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mmap.c > index 43d0b5578f46..2070cfe19cac 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mmap.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mmap.c > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ void test_mmap(void) > /* unmap second page: pages 1, 3 mapped */ > err = munmap(tmp1 + page_size, page_size); > if (CHECK(err, "adv_mmap2", "errno %d\n", errno)) { > - munmap(tmp1, map_sz); > + munmap(tmp1, 3 * page_size); this is a good catch, thank you! > goto cleanup; > } > > @@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ void test_mmap(void) > CHECK(tmp1 + page_size != tmp2, "adv_mmap4", > "tmp1: %p, tmp2: %p\n", tmp1, tmp2); > > - /* re-map all 4 pages */ > - tmp2 = mmap(tmp1, 4 * page_size, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED, > + /* re-map all 3 pages */ > + tmp2 = mmap(tmp1, 3 * page_size, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED, > data_map_fd, 0); "all 3 pages" is a lie, there are 4. I'd still want to work with all 4 pages. How about we mmap() 4 pages of anonymous memory first, then do all the mmap() with MAP_FIXED, re-using that memory range. That will ensure that we are not stepping on any other allocated memory, right? > if (CHECK(tmp2 == MAP_FAILED, "adv_mmap5", "errno %d\n", errno)) { > munmap(tmp1, 3 * page_size); /* unmap page 1 */ > @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ void test_mmap(void) > CHECK_FAIL(map_data->val[2] != 321); > CHECK_FAIL(map_data->val[far] != 3 * 321); > > - munmap(tmp2, 4 * page_size); > + munmap(tmp2, 3 * page_size); > > /* map all 4 pages, but with pg_off=1 page, should fail */ > tmp1 = mmap(NULL, 4 * page_size, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED, > -- > 2.17.1 >