On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:25 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> wrote: > > As rlimit-based memory accounting is not used by bpf anymore, > there are no more reasons to play with memlock rlimit. > > Delete bpf_rlimit.h which contained a code to bump the limit. > > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> > --- We run test_progs on old kernels as part of libbpf Github CI. We'll need to either leave setrlimit() or do it conditionally, depending on detected kernel feature support. > samples/bpf/hbm.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h | 28 ------------------- > .../selftests/bpf/flow_dissector_load.c | 1 - > .../selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c | 1 - > .../bpf/prog_tests/select_reuseport.c | 1 - > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c | 1 - > .../selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_dev_cgroup.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_netcnt.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 1 - > .../selftests/bpf/test_skb_cgroup_id_user.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c | 1 - > .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_fields.c | 1 - > .../selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c | 1 - > .../bpf/test_tcp_check_syncookie_user.c | 1 - > .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf_user.c | 1 - > .../selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c | 1 - > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 1 - > .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier_log.c | 2 -- > 27 files changed, 55 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h > [...]
