Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 01/15] qed: reformat "qed_chain.h" a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:10:31AM +0300, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Reformat structs and macros definitions a bit prior to making functional
> changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kalderon <michal.kalderon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h | 126 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h b/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h
> index 7071dc92b4e2..087073517c09 100644
> +++ b/include/linux/qed/qed_chain.h
> @@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ enum qed_chain_mode {
>  };
>  
>  enum qed_chain_use_mode {
> -	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_PRODUCE,		/* Chain starts empty */
> -	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME,		/* Chain starts full */
> -	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME_PRODUCE,	/* Chain starts empty */
> +	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_PRODUCE,			/* Chain starts empty */
> +	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME,			/* Chain starts full */
> +	QED_CHAIN_USE_TO_CONSUME_PRODUCE,		/* Chain starts empty */
>  };
>  
>  enum qed_chain_cnt_type {
> @@ -40,84 +40,86 @@ enum qed_chain_cnt_type {
>  };
>  
>  struct qed_chain_next {
> -	struct regpair	next_phys;
> -	void		*next_virt;
> +	struct regpair					next_phys;
> +	void						*next_virt;
>  };

I'm surprised this is considered an improvement??

I've been encouring people to go the other way, maintaining vertical alignment is
harmful to backporting..

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux