Re: [PATCH 0/5] s390/bpf: fix lib/test_bpf.c failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] s390/bpf: fix lib/test_bpf.c failures
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:17:08 -0700
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200717165326.6786-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 9:53 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patch series fixes three regressions caused by 4e9b4a6883dd
> ("s390/bpf: Use relative long branches") reported by Seth Forshee
> (patches 2-4) and adds two minor related improvements (patches 1
> and 5).

Applied. Thanks

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] s390/bpf: fix lib/test_bpf.c failures
  - From: Ilya Leoshkevich

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Make cgroup storages shared across attaches on the same cgroup
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: separate bpf_get_[stack|stackid] for perf events BPF
Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/5] s390/bpf: use bpf_skip() in bpf_jit_prologue()
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] compute bpf_skc_to_*() helper socket btf ids at build time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux