On 7/10/20 6:26 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote: >> >> The point of DEVMAP_HASH is to allow map management where key == device >> index (vs DEVMAP which for any non-trivial use case is going to require >> key != device index). You could require the exclude map to be >> DEVMAP_HASH and the key to be the index allowing you to do a direct >> lookup. Having to roam the entire map looking for a match does not scale >> and is going to have poor performance with increasing number of entries. >> XDP is targeted at performance with expert level of control, so >> constraints like this have to be part of the deal. > > Yes, if we have this constraints the performance should have some improvement. > > Do you think we should do it right now or in later performance update patch. > It needs to be in the same release as the initial patches. Easiest to include with the initial set, but a followup is fine if it happens before this dev cycle is over.
