On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:29 PM Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Introduce helper bpf_get_task_stack(), which dumps stack trace of given
> task. This is different to bpf_get_stack(), which gets stack track of
> current task. One potential use case of bpf_get_task_stack() is to call
> it from bpf_iter__task and dump all /proc/<pid>/stack to a seq_file.
>
> bpf_get_task_stack() uses stack_trace_save_tsk() instead of
> get_perf_callchain() for kernel stack. The benefit of this choice is that
> stack_trace_save_tsk() doesn't require changes in arch/. The downside of
> using stack_trace_save_tsk() is that stack_trace_save_tsk() dumps the
> stack trace to unsigned long array. For 32-bit systems, we need to
> translate it to u64 array.
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 36 +++++++++++++++-
> kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 +-
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 +
> scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py | 2 +
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 36 +++++++++++++++-
> 7 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 7de98906ddf4a..b608185e1ffd5 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -4864,7 +4864,9 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - if (func_id == BPF_FUNC_get_stack && !env->prog->has_callchain_buf) {
> + if ((func_id == BPF_FUNC_get_stack ||
> + func_id == BPF_FUNC_get_task_stack) &&
> + !env->prog->has_callchain_buf) {
> const char *err_str;
>
I'm glad it was so simple :) Thanks for checking!
[...]
