On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 12:06 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 6/19/20 4:04 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > bpf_object__find_program_by_title(), used by CO-RE relocation code, doesn't > > return .text "BPF program", if it is a function storage for sub-programs. > > Because of that, any CO-RE relocation in helper non-inlined functions will > > fail. Fix this by searching for .text-corresponding BPF program manually. > > > > Adjust one of bpf_iter selftest to exhibit this pattern. > > > > Reported-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> > > Fixes: ddc7c3042614 ("libbpf: implement BPF CO-RE offset relocation algorithm") > > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> > > But the fix here only fixed the issue for interpreter mode. > For jit only mode, we still have issues. The following patch can fix > the jit mode issue, > > ============= > > From 4d66814513ec45b86a30a1231b8a000d4bfc6f1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 23:26:13 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: set the number of exception entries properly for > subprograms > > Currently, if a bpf program has more than one subprograms, each > program will be jitted separately. For tracing problem, the > prog->aux->num_exentries is not setup properly. For example, > with bpf_iter_netlink.c modified to force one function not inlined, > and with proper libbpf fix, with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON, > we will have error like below: > $ ./test_progs -n 3/3 > ... > libbpf: failed to load program 'iter/netlink' > libbpf: failed to load object 'bpf_iter_netlink' > libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'bpf_iter_netlink': -4007 > test_netlink:FAIL:bpf_iter_netlink__open_and_load skeleton > open_and_load failed > #3/3 netlink:FAIL > The dmesg shows the following errors: > ex gen bug > which is triggered by the following code in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: > if (excnt >= bpf_prog->aux->num_exentries) { > pr_err("ex gen bug\n"); > return -EFAULT; > } > > If the program has more than one subprograms, num_exentries is actually > 0 since it is not setup. > > This patch fixed the issue by setuping proper num_exentries for > each subprogram before calling jit function. > > Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> Thanks for fixing. Applied both to bpf tree. Yonghong, next time please submit the patch properly. It was very awkward to copy-paste it manually from the thread. I've edited the commit log a bit.