On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:08 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This helper can be used with bpf_iter__task to dump all /proc/*/stack to
> a seq_file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 +++++++++-
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py | 2 ++
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 +++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 19684813faaed..a30416b822fe3 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -3252,6 +3252,13 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * case of **BPF_CSUM_LEVEL_QUERY**, the current skb->csum_level
> * is returned or the error code -EACCES in case the skb is not
> * subject to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
> + *
> + * int bpf_get_task_stack_trace(struct task_struct *task, void *entries, u32 size)
> + * Description
> + * Save a task stack trace into array *entries*. This is a wrapper
> + * over stack_trace_save_tsk().
> + * Return
> + * Number of trace entries stored.
> */
> #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN) \
> FN(unspec), \
> @@ -3389,7 +3396,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
> FN(ringbuf_submit), \
> FN(ringbuf_discard), \
> FN(ringbuf_query), \
> - FN(csum_level),
> + FN(csum_level), \
> + FN(get_task_stack_trace),
We have get_stackid and get_stack, I think to stay consistent it
should be named get_task_stack
>
> /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
> * function eBPF program intends to call
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index e729c9e587a07..2c13bcb5c2bce 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -1488,6 +1488,23 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stack_proto_raw_tp = {
> .arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
> };
>
> +BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_task_stack_trace, struct task_struct *, task,
> + void *, entries, u32, size)
See get_stack definition, this one needs to support flags as well. And
we should probably support BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID as well. And
BPF_F_USER_STACK is also a good idea, I presume?
> +{
> + return stack_trace_save_tsk(task, (unsigned long *)entries, size, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int bpf_get_task_stack_trace_btf_ids[5];
> +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_task_stack_trace_proto = {
> + .func = bpf_get_task_stack_trace,
> + .gpl_only = true,
> + .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
> + .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
> + .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
> + .arg3_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
> + .btf_id = bpf_get_task_stack_trace_btf_ids,
> +};
> +
[...]
