On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:55 PM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As for DEVMAP, support SEC("xdp_cpumap*") as a short cut for loading
> the program with type BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP and expected attach type
> BPF_XDP_CPUMAP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 477c679ed945..0cd13cad8375 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -6655,6 +6655,8 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
> .attach_fn = attach_iter),
> BPF_EAPROG_SEC("xdp_devmap", BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
> BPF_XDP_DEVMAP),
> + BPF_EAPROG_SEC("xdp_cpumap", BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
> + BPF_XDP_CPUMAP),
I noticed that XDP and a bunch of other progs don't enforce "/" at the
end of the prog type prefix. Is there any reason for that? Tracing
prog types are pretty consistent about that (except for perf_event, I
think). I'd love it if we were trying to converge here. Do you mind
switching this to "xdp_cpumap/"? Would be nice to do the same for
xdp_devmap, if it's not too late yet.
> BPF_PROG_SEC("xdp", BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP),
> BPF_PROG_SEC("perf_event", BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT),
> BPF_PROG_SEC("lwt_in", BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN),
> --
> 2.26.2
>
