Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add variable-length data concat pattern less than test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 05:09:04PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Extend original variable-length tests with a case to catch a common
> existing pattern of testing for < 0 for errors. Note because
> verifier also tracks upper bounds and we know it can not be greater
> than MAX_LEN here we can skip upper bound check.
> 
> In ALU64 enabled compilation converting from long->int return types
> in probe helpers results in extra instruction pattern, <<= 32, s >>= 32.
> The trade-off is the non-ALU64 case works. If you really care about
> every extra insn (XDP case?) then you probably should be using original
> int type.
> 
> In addition adding a sext insn to bpf might help the verifier in the
> general case to avoid these types of tricks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>

Please keep John's 'Author:' on the patch.
git commit --author= --amend
or keep 'From:' when you applied to your local git.
Also add your SOB after John's.
Even if you didn't change the patch at all.
Same thing if you've reworked the patch.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux