On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:06 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There's no need for it. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- It matches bpf_verifier_ops->btf_struct_access, though, which, I think, actually allows write access for some special cases. So I think we should keep it. > include/linux/bpf.h | 1 - > kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 +-- > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- > net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > [...]