Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: add variable-length data concatenation pattern test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/16/20 7:04 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
Add selftest that validates variable-length data reading and concatentation
with one big shared data array. This is a common pattern in production use for
monitoring and tracing applications, that potentially can read a lot of data,
but usually reads much less. Such pattern allows to determine precisely what
amount of data needs to be sent over perfbuf/ringbuf and maximize efficiency.

This is the first BPF selftest that at all looks at and tests
bpf_probe_read_str()-like helper's return value, closing a major gap in BPF
testing. It surfaced the problem with bpf_probe_read_kernel_str() returning
0 on success, instead of amount of bytes successfully read.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>

Fix looks good, but I'm seeing an issue in the selftest on my side. With latest
Clang/LLVM I'm getting:

# ./test_progs -t varlen
#86 varlen:OK
Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

All good, however, the test_progs-no_alu32 fails for me with:

# ./test_progs-no_alu32 -t varlen
Switching to flavor 'no_alu32' subdirectory...
libbpf: load bpf program failed: Invalid argument
libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG ---
libbpf:
arg#0 type is not a struct
Unrecognized arg#0 type PTR
; int pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
0: (85) call bpf_get_current_pid_tgid#14
; int pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
1: (77) r0 >>= 32
; if (test_pid != pid || !capture)
2: (18) r1 = 0xffffb14a4010c200
4: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
 R0_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=map_value(id=0,off=512,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) R10=fp0
; if (test_pid != pid || !capture)
5: (5d) if r1 != r0 goto pc+43
 R0_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R10=fp0
6: (18) r1 = 0xffffb14a4010c204
8: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0)
 R0_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=map_value(id=0,off=516,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) R10=fp0
9: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+39
 R0=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0
; len = bpf_probe_read_kernel_str(payload, MAX_LEN, &buf_in1[0]);
10: (18) r6 = 0xffffb14a4010c220
12: (18) r1 = 0xffffb14a4010c220
14: (b7) r2 = 256
15: (18) r3 = 0xffffb14a4010c000
17: (85) call bpf_probe_read_kernel_str#115
 R0=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=map_value(id=0,off=544,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) R2_w=inv256 R3_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) R6_w=map_value(id=0,off=544,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) R10=fp0
last_idx 17 first_idx 9
regs=4 stack=0 before 15: (18) r3 = 0xffffb14a4010c000
regs=4 stack=0 before 14: (b7) r2 = 256
18: (67) r0 <<= 32
19: (bf) r1 = r0
20: (77) r1 >>= 32
; if (len <= MAX_LEN) {
21: (25) if r1 > 0x100 goto pc+7
 R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=1099511627776,umax_value=18446744069414584320,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000000),s32_min_value=0,s32_max_value=0,u32_max_value=0) R1=inv(id=0,umax_value=256,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ff)) R6=map_value(id=0,off=544,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) R10=fp0
;
22: (c7) r0 s>>= 32
; payload1_len1 = len;
23: (18) r1 = 0xffffb14a4010c208
25: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r0
 R0_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,smax_value=256) R1_w=map_value(id=0,off=520,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) R6=map_value(id=0,off=544,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) R10=fp0
; payload += len;
26: (18) r6 = 0xffffb14a4010c220
28: (0f) r6 += r0
last_idx 28 first_idx 21
regs=1 stack=0 before 26: (18) r6 = 0xffffb14a4010c220
regs=1 stack=0 before 25: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +0) = r0
regs=1 stack=0 before 23: (18) r1 = 0xffffb14a4010c208
regs=1 stack=0 before 22: (c7) r0 s>>= 32
regs=1 stack=0 before 21: (25) if r1 > 0x100 goto pc+7
 R0_rw=invP(id=0,smax_value=1099511627776,umax_value=18446744069414584320,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000000),s32_min_value=0,s32_max_value=0,u32_max_value=0) R1_rw=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R6_w=map_value(id=0,off=544,ks=4,vs=1056,imm=0) R10=fp0
parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks
last_idx 20 first_idx 9
regs=1 stack=0 before 20: (77) r1 >>= 32
regs=1 stack=0 before 19: (bf) r1 = r0
regs=1 stack=0 before 18: (67) r0 <<= 32
regs=1 stack=0 before 17: (85) call bpf_probe_read_kernel_str#115
value -2147483648 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds
processed 22 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 2 peak_states 2 mark_read 1

libbpf: -- END LOG --
libbpf: failed to load program 'raw_tp/sys_enter'
libbpf: failed to load object 'test_varlen'
libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_varlen': -4007
test_varlen:FAIL:skel_open failed to open skeleton
#86 varlen:FAIL
Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux