On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 14:45:32 +0200
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Commit 60d53e2c3b75 ("tracing/probe: Split trace_event related data from
> trace_probe") removed the trace_[ku]probe structure from the
> trace_event_call->data pointer. As bpf_get_[ku]probe_info() were
> forgotten in that change, fix them now. These functions are currently
> only used by the bpf_task_fd_query() syscall handler to collect
> information about a perf event.
>
Oops, good catch!
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 60d53e2c3b75 ("tracing/probe: Split trace_event related data from trace_probe")
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you!
> ---
> Found while trying to run the task_fd_query BPF sample. I intend to try
> and move that sample to kselftests since it seems like a useful
> regression test.
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 2 +-
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> index 35989383ae113..8eeb95e04bf52 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@ int bpf_get_kprobe_info(const struct perf_event *event, u32 *fd_type,
> if (perf_type_tracepoint)
> tk = find_trace_kprobe(pevent, group);
> else
> - tk = event->tp_event->data;
> + tk = trace_kprobe_primary_from_call(event->tp_event);
> if (!tk)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 2a8e8e9c1c754..fdd47f99b18fd 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ int bpf_get_uprobe_info(const struct perf_event *event, u32 *fd_type,
> if (perf_type_tracepoint)
> tu = find_probe_event(pevent, group);
> else
> - tu = event->tp_event->data;
> + tu = trace_uprobe_primary_from_call(event->tp_event);
> if (!tu)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
