[PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: Fix an error code in check_btf_func()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This code returns success if the "info_aux" allocation fails but it
should return -ENOMEM.

Fixes: 8c1b6e69dcc1 ("bpf: Compare BTF types of functions arguments with actual types")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: style change

 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 5c7bbaac81ef9..34cde841ab681 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7552,7 +7552,7 @@ static int check_btf_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	const struct btf *btf;
 	void __user *urecord;
 	u32 prev_offset = 0;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 
 	nfuncs = attr->func_info_cnt;
 	if (!nfuncs)
-- 
2.26.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux