Re: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 0/2] xdp: add dev map multicast support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:21:54PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > The example in patch 2 is functional, but not a lot of effort
> > has been made on performance optimisation. I did a simple test(pkt size 64)
> > with pktgen. Here is the test result with BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH
> > arrays:
> >
> > bpf_redirect_map() with 1 ingress, 1 egress:
> > generic path: ~1600k pps
> > native path: ~980k pps
> >
> > bpf_redirect_map_multi() with 1 ingress, 3 egress:
> > generic path: ~600k pps
> > native path: ~480k pps
> >
> > bpf_redirect_map_multi() with 1 ingress, 9 egress:
> > generic path: ~125k pps
> > native path: ~100k pps
> >
> > The bpf_redirect_map_multi() is slower than bpf_redirect_map() as we loop
> > the arrays and do clone skb/xdpf. The native path is slower than generic
> > path as we send skbs by pktgen. So the result looks reasonable.
> 
> How are you running these tests? Still on virtual devices? We really
> need results from a physical setup in native mode to assess the impact
> on the native-XDP fast path. The numbers above don't tell much in this
> regard. I'd also like to see a before/after patch for straight
> bpf_redirect_map(), since you're messing with the fast path, and we want
> to make sure it's not causing a performance regression for regular
> redirect.
> 
> Finally, since the overhead seems to be quite substantial: A comparison
> with a regular network stack bridge might make sense? After all we also
> want to make sure it's a performance win over that :)

Hi Toke,

Here is the result I tested with 2 i40e 10G ports on physical machine.
The pktgen pkt_size is 64.

Bridge forwarding(I use sample/bpf/xdp1 to count the PPS, so there are two modes data):
generic mode: 1.32M PPS
driver mode: 1.66M PPS

xdp_redirect_map:
generic mode: 1.88M PPS
driver mode: 2.74M PPS

xdp_redirect_map_multi:
generic mode: 1.38M PPS
driver mode: 2.73M PPS

So what do you think about the data. If you are OK, I will update
my patch and re-post it.

Thanks
Hangbin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux