On 5/28/20 12:34 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:29 AM Yauheni Kaliuta
<yauheni.kaliuta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 9:16 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:07:09AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
[...]
Here is what CI users are requesting:
- ability to install bpf test with other selftests using kselftest
install. The common framework is in place and with minor changes
to bpf test Makefile, we can make this happen. Others and myself
are willing to work on this, so we can get bpf test coverage in
test rings.
so you're saying that bpf maintainers and all bpf developers now
would need to incorporate new 'make install' step to their workflow
because some unknown CI system that is not even functional decided
to do 'make install' ?
That's exactly my point about selfish CI developers who put their
needs in front of bpf community of developers.
May be, it can work both ways to make everybody happy :) (I haven't
seen yet fundamental problems why not).
then stop pretending and do 'cp -r' for your CI as you were suggested
several times already.
It works just fine for libbpf CI. Feel free to copy those scripts.
Yauheni,
Let's drop discussing this patch set. I don't have all the patches
and changes in this to weigh in. There is no need to add cp -r at all.
I want to take the discussion one level up to the use-cases.
thanks,
-- Shuah
