Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add SO_KEEPALIVE and related options to bpf_setsockopt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




27.05.2020, 20:03, "Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@xxxxxx>:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:05:43PM +0300, Dmitry Yakunin wrote:
>>  This patch adds support of SO_KEEPALIVE flag and TCP related options
>>  to bpf_setsockopt() routine. This is helpful if we want to enable or tune
>>  TCP keepalive for applications which don't do it in the userspace code.
>>  In order to avoid copy-paste, common code from classic setsockopt was moved
>>  to auxiliary functions in the headers.
>
> Thanks for refatoring some of the pieces. I suspect some more can be done.
> In the long run, I don't think this copy-and-paste is scalable.
> For most of the options (integer value and do not need ns_capable()),
> do_tcp_setsockopt() and sock_setsockopt() can be directly called with
> some refactoring.
>
> The change looks good. For this patch,
>
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>

Thanks for your comment, Martin.
I agree with you, bpf_setsockopt and older setsockopts should be refactored to use common code.
I'll keep this in mind if i want to add new options.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux