Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: fix perf_buffer__free() API for sparse allocs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:42 AM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In case the cpu_bufs are sparsely allocated they are not
> all free'ed. These changes will fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Thanks a lot!

You forgot:

Fixes: fb84b8224655 ("libbpf: add perf buffer API")

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>

>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 5d60de6fd818..74d967619dcf 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -8137,9 +8137,12 @@ void perf_buffer__free(struct perf_buffer *pb)
>         if (!pb)
>                 return;
>         if (pb->cpu_bufs) {
> -               for (i = 0; i < pb->cpu_cnt && pb->cpu_bufs[i]; i++) {
> +               for (i = 0; i < pb->cpu_cnt; i++) {
>                         struct perf_cpu_buf *cpu_buf = pb->cpu_bufs[i];
>
> +                       if (!cpu_buf)
> +                               continue;
> +
>                         bpf_map_delete_elem(pb->map_fd, &cpu_buf->map_key);
>                         perf_buffer__free_cpu_buf(pb, cpu_buf);
>                 }
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux