Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: split -extras target to -static and -gen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:31 PM Yauheni Kaliuta
<yauheni.kaliuta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Andrii!
>
> >>>>> On Tue, 26 May 2020 17:19:18 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko  wrote:
>
>  > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:19 AM Yauheni Kaliuta
>  > <yauheni.kaliuta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> There is difference in depoying static and generated extra resource
>  >> files between in/out of tree build and flavors:
>  >>
>  >> - in case of unflavored out-of-tree build static files are not
>  >> available and must be copied as well as both static and generated
>  >> files for flavored build.
>  >>
>  >> So split the rules and variables. The name TRUNNER_EXTRA_GEN_FILES
>  >> is chosen in analogy to TEST_GEN_* variants.
>  >>
>
>  > Can we keep them together but be smarter about what needs to
>  > be copied based on source/target directories? I would really
>  > like to not blow up all these rules.
>
> I can try, ok, I just find it a bit more clear. But it's good to
> get some input from kselftest about OOT build in general.

I see no value in 'make install' of selftests/bpf
and since it's broken just remove that makefile target.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux