On 5/22/20 10:11 AM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> @@ -259,28 +270,64 @@ static int cpu_map_kthread_run(void *data)
> * kthread CPU pinned. Lockless access to ptr_ring
> * consume side valid as no-resize allowed of queue.
> */
> - n = ptr_ring_consume_batched(rcpu->queue, frames, CPUMAP_BATCH);
> + n = ptr_ring_consume_batched(rcpu->queue, xdp_frames,
> + CPUMAP_BATCH);
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + prog = READ_ONCE(rcpu->prog);
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> - void *f = frames[i];
> + void *f = xdp_frames[i];
> struct page *page = virt_to_page(f);
> + struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
> + struct xdp_buff xdp;
> + u32 act;
>
> /* Bring struct page memory area to curr CPU. Read by
> * build_skb_around via page_is_pfmemalloc(), and when
> * freed written by page_frag_free call.
> */
> prefetchw(page);
> + if (!prog) {
> + frames[nframes++] = xdp_frames[i];
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + xdpf = f;
> + xdp.data_hard_start = xdpf->data - xdpf->headroom;
> + xdp.data = xdpf->data;
> + xdp.data_end = xdpf->data + xdpf->len;
> + xdp.data_meta = xdpf->data - xdpf->metasize;
> + xdp.frame_sz = xdpf->frame_sz;
> + /* TODO: rxq */
> +
> + act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, &xdp);
Why not run the program in cpu_map_enqueue before converting from
xdp_buff to xdp_frame?
