On 2020-05-19 17:18, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi "Björn,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on jkirsher-next-queue/dev-queue next-20200518]
[cannot apply to bpf/master linus/master v5.7-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Bj-rn-T-pel/Introduce-AF_XDP-buffer-allocation-API/20200519-203122
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: riscv-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=riscv
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c:531:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'i40e_fd_handle_status' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
531 | void i40e_fd_handle_status(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, u64 qword0_raw,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, this could indeed be made static. Hmm, I wonder why I didn't get
that warning on my x86-64 build!? I'll spin a v4 (or do a follow-up?).
Björn