Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, bpftool: Allow probing for CONFIG_HZ from kernel config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:00 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In Cilium we've recently switched to make use of bpf_jiffies64() for
> parts of our tc and XDP datapath since bpf_ktime_get_ns() is more
> expensive and high-precision is not needed for our timeouts we have
> anyway. Our agent has a probe manager which picks up the json of
> bpftool's feature probe and we also use the macro output in our C
> programs e.g. to have workarounds when helpers are not available on
> older kernels.
>
> Extend the kernel config info dump to also include the kernel's
> CONFIG_HZ, and rework the probe_kernel_image_config() for allowing a
> macro dump such that CONFIG_HZ can be propagated to BPF C code as a
> simple define if available via config. Latter allows to have _compile-
> time_ resolution of jiffies <-> sec conversion in our code since all
> are propagated as known constants.
>
> Given we cannot generally assume availability of kconfig everywhere,
> we also have a kernel hz probe [0] as a fallback. Potentially, bpftool
> could have an integrated probe fallback as well, although to derive it,
> we might need to place it under 'bpftool feature probe full' or similar
> given it would slow down the probing process overall. Yet 'full' doesn't
> fit either for us since we don't want to pollute the kernel log with
> warning messages from bpf_probe_write_user() and bpf_trace_printk() on
> agent startup; I've left it out for the time being.
>
>   [0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/blob/master/bpf/cilium-probe-kernel-hz.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
> ---

libbpf supports kconfig values, so don't have to even probe for that,
it will just appear as a constant global variable:

extern unsigned long CONFIG_HZ __kconfig;

But I assume you want this for iproute2 case, which doesn't support
this, right? We really should try to make iproute2 just use libbpf as
a loader with all the libbpf features available. I think all (at least
all major ones) features needed are already there in libbpf, iproute2
would just need to implement custom support for old-style map
definitions and maybe something else, not sure. I wonder if any of
iproute2/BPF users willing to spend some effort on this?

>  tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>

[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux