On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:58 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Make libbpf aware of the newly added program type, and assign it a
> section name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 3 +++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 2 ++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 2 ++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 977add1b73e2..74f4a15dc19e 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -6524,6 +6524,7 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(perf_event, BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT);
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(tracing, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING);
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(struct_ops, BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS);
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(extension, BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT);
> +BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(sk_lookup, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP);
>
> enum bpf_attach_type
> bpf_program__get_expected_attach_type(struct bpf_program *prog)
> @@ -6684,6 +6685,8 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
> BPF_EAPROG_SEC("cgroup/setsockopt", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT,
> BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT),
> BPF_PROG_SEC("struct_ops", BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS),
> + BPF_EAPROG_SEC("sk_lookup", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
> + BPF_SK_LOOKUP),
> };
>
> #undef BPF_PROG_SEC_IMPL
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index f1dacecb1619..8373fbacbba3 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_perf_event(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_tracing(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_struct_ops(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_extension(struct bpf_program *prog);
> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_sk_lookup(struct bpf_program *prog);
>
> LIBBPF_API enum bpf_prog_type bpf_program__get_type(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__set_type(struct bpf_program *prog,
> @@ -364,6 +365,7 @@ LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_perf_event(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_tracing(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_struct_ops(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_extension(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> +LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_sk_lookup(const struct bpf_program *prog);
cc Yonghong, bpf_iter programs should probably have similar
is_xxx/set_xxx functions?..
>
> /*
> * No need for __attribute__((packed)), all members of 'bpf_map_def'
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> index e03bd4db827e..113ac0a669c2 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.8 {
> bpf_program__set_attach_target;
> bpf_program__set_lsm;
> bpf_set_link_xdp_fd_opts;
> + bpf_program__is_sk_lookup;
> + bpf_program__set_sk_lookup;
> } LIBBPF_0.0.7;
>
0.0.8 is sealed, please add them into 0.0.9 map below
> LIBBPF_0.0.9 {
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c
> index 2c92059c0c90..5c6d3e49f254 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ probe_load(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, const struct bpf_insn *insns,
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP:
> default:
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.25.3
>
