On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:40 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If bits is 0, the case when the map is empty, then the >> is the size of
> the register which is undefined behavior - on x86 it is the same as a
> shift by 0. Fix by handling the 0 case explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
No need. The only case when bits can be 0 is when hashmap is
completely empty (no elements have ever been added yet). In that case,
it doesn't matter what value hash_bits() returns,
hashmap__for_each_key_entry/hashmap__for_each_key_entry_safe will
behave correctly, because map->buckets will be NULL.
> tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h b/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h
> index d5ef212a55ba..781db653d16c 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
> static inline size_t hash_bits(size_t h, int bits)
> {
> /* shuffle bits and return requested number of upper bits */
> + if (bits == 0)
> + return 0;
> return (h * 11400714819323198485llu) >> (__WORDSIZE - bits);
> }
>
> --
> 2.26.2.645.ge9eca65c58-goog
>
