Re: [PATCH v2] bpf, i386: remove unneeded conversion to bool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 6, 2020 7:03:52 AM PDT, Jason Yan <yanaijie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>The '==' expression itself is bool, no need to convert it to bool
>again.
>This fixes the following coccicheck warning:
>
>arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c:1478:50-55: WARNING: conversion to bool
>not needed here
>arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c:1479:50-55: WARNING: conversion to bool
>not needed here
>
>Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> v2: change the name 'x32' to 'i386'.
>
> arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
>b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
>index 66cd150b7e54..96fde03aa987 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
>@@ -1475,8 +1475,8 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int
>*addrs, u8 *image,
> 	for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
> 		const s32 imm32 = insn->imm;
> 		const bool is64 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64;
>-		const bool dstk = insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_AX ? false : true;
>-		const bool sstk = insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_AX ? false : true;
>+		const bool dstk = insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_AX;
>+		const bool sstk = insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_AX;
> 		const u8 code = insn->code;
> 		const u8 *dst = bpf2ia32[insn->dst_reg];
> 		const u8 *src = bpf2ia32[insn->src_reg];

"foo ? true : false" is also far better written !!foo when it isn't totally redundant.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux