On 2020/4/30 9:25, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Some versions of GCC falsely detect that vi might not be initialized. That's
> not true, but let's silence it with NULL initialization.
>
This title seems not appropriate, 'unused' --> 'initialized' ?
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index d86ff8214b96..977add1b73e2 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -5003,8 +5003,8 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_map_relos(struct bpf_object *obj,
> GElf_Shdr *shdr, Elf_Data *data)
> {
> int i, j, nrels, new_sz, ptr_sz = sizeof(void *);
> + const struct btf_var_secinfo *vi = NULL;
> const struct btf_type *sec, *var, *def;
> - const struct btf_var_secinfo *vi;
> const struct btf_member *member;
> struct bpf_map *map, *targ_map;
> const char *name, *mname;
>
