On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:57:19AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Currently, bpf_getsocktop and bpf_setsockopt helpers operate on the
> 'struct bpf_sock_ops' context in BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT program.
> Let's generalize them and make the first argument be 'struct bpf_sock'.
> That way, in the future, we can allow those helpers in more places.
>
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT still has the existing helpers that operate
> on 'struct bpf_sock_ops', but we add new bpf_{g,s}etsockopt that work
> on 'struct bpf_sock'. [Alternatively, for BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT,
> we can enable them both and teach verifier to pick the right one
> based on the context (bpf_sock_ops vs bpf_sock).]
>
> As an example, let's allow those 'struct bpf_sock' based helpers to
> be called from the BPF_CGROUP_INET{4,6}_CONNECT hooks. That way
> we can override CC before the connection is made.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good to me and safety checks seem to be correct.
Martin,
could you please help review as well?
