On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:59:41PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> linux-next build bot reported compile issue [1] with one of its
> configs. It looks like when we have CONFIG_NET=n and
> CONFIG_BPF{,_SYSCALL}=y, we are missing the bpf_base_func_proto
> definition (from net/core/filter.c) in cgroup_base_func_proto.
>
> I'm reshuffling the code a bit to make it work. The common helpers
> are moved into kernel/bpf/helpers.c and the bpf_base_func_proto is
> exported from there.
> Also, bpf_get_raw_cpu_id goes into kernel/bpf/core.c akin to existing
> bpf_user_rnd_u32.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/CAKH8qBsBvKHswiX1nx40LgO+BGeTmb1NX8tiTttt_0uu6T3dCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#mff8b0c083314c68c2e2ef0211cb11bc20dc13c72
>
> Fixes: 76800cfc27c6 ("bpf: Enable more helpers for BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_{DEVICE,SYSCTL,SOCKOPT}")
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied, Thanks
