The current JIT uses the following sequence to zero-extend into the
upper 32 bits of the destination register for BPF_LDX BPF_{B,H,W},
when the destination register is not on the stack:
EMIT3(0xC7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_hi), 0);
However, this is not a valid instruction on x86.
This patch fixes the problem by instead emitting "xor dst_hi,dst_hi"
to clear the upper 32 bits.
This bug may not be currently triggerable as BPF_REG_AX is the only
register not stored on the stack and the verifier uses it in a limited
way, and the verifier implements a zero-extension optimization. But the
JIT should avoid emitting invalid instructions regardless.
Fixes: 03f5781be2c7b ("bpf, x86_32: add eBPF JIT compiler for ia32")
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 4d2a7a764602..cc9ad3892ea6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -1854,7 +1854,9 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
STACK_VAR(dst_hi));
EMIT(0x0, 4);
} else {
- EMIT3(0xC7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_hi), 0);
+ /* xor dst_hi,dst_hi */
+ EMIT2(0x33,
+ add_2reg(0xC0, dst_hi, dst_hi));
}
break;
case BPF_DW:
--
2.17.1
