On 2020/4/15 15:23, Song Liu wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 14, 2020, at 6:37 PM, maowenan <maowenan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/4/15 6:05, Song Liu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Apr 13, 2020, at 4:37 AM, Mao Wenan <maowenan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>>>>
>>>> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5603:18: warning: variable ‘dst_known’
>>>> set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>>>
>>>> It is not used since commit f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier:
>>>> rework value tracking")
>>>
>>> The fix makes sense. But I think f1174f77b50c introduced dst_known,
>>> so this statement is not accurate.
>>>
>> thanks for review, yes, f1174f77b50c introduced dst_known, and below commit
>> doesn't deference variable dst_known. So I send v2 later?
>> 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
>
> I don't think we need to back port this to stable. So it is OK not to
> include Fixes tag. We can just remove this statement in the commit log.
>
> bpf-next is not open yet. Please send v2 when bpf-next is open.
>
> Thanks,
> Song
>
OK, I will do that.
