On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:25:33PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index a245f0df53c4..fc2157e319f1 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ enum bpf_cmd {
> BPF_MAP_DELETE_BATCH,
> BPF_LINK_CREATE,
> BPF_LINK_UPDATE,
> + BPF_DUMP_QUERY,
> };
>
> enum bpf_map_type {
> @@ -594,6 +595,18 @@ union bpf_attr {
> __u32 old_prog_fd;
> } link_update;
>
> + struct {
> + __u32 query_fd;
> + __u32 flags;
> + union {
> + struct {
> + __aligned_u64 target_proto;
> + __u32 proto_buf_len;
> + };
> + __u32 prog_id;
> + };
> + } dump_query;
I think it would be cleaner to use BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD instead of
introducing new command.
